Matt (00:00.578)
Hey everybody, welcome to the Latter Day Lens. It is so good to have you with us this week. I'm your host, Matt, and with me as always is Sean. And we are so excited to have Porter back with us. Welcome, Porter.
Porter (00:12.244)
Thank you.
shawn (00:13.272)
Yeah.
Matt (00:13.432)
Porter is like of his generation, I've decided Porter is the wise voice of his generation. Like, do you ever feel Porter like you're not like the other kids in some ways?
shawn (00:19.21)
Yeah.
Porter (00:23.604)
Well, I have two kids, which is two kids more than most twenty five year olds. so yes, that tends to make me feel different. Yeah.
Matt (00:29.55)
It's true. People your age don't want to have kids anymore. Yeah. Yeah. Why are you having kids when nobody else is, Porter? Doesn't that make you feel like you're doing something wrong?
Porter (00:42.4)
my question is more why aren't other people having kids? It's pretty awesome.
shawn (00:45.56)
Yeah.
Matt (00:46.816)
Yeah, I agree. so we'll open up the mailbag. we're gonna do this. I didn't put anything in the mailbag, but Elder Christofferson, in the most recent session of General Conference, he talked about gambling. he said that gambling is actually morally wrong, which probably isn't news to a lot of our listeners, but he focused on
shawn (01:07.031)
Yeah.
Matt (01:09.698)
That gambling is profiting at other people's expense and that you're trying to get something for nothing and you don't produce anything of value in gambling. And so this is the the question I have in the mailbag, as if President Christofferson wrote in So, you know, the church takes stands on moral issues when it comes to politics. Is gambling one of those things where we as members of the church should take political stands and see if we can get maybe some of these gambling websites made illegal in our states or do s things to shut them down.
Porter (01:38.568)
Mm-hmm.
Well, I'd say these gambling websites like Calchi and Polymarket, they are illegal in most states, but have tried to skirt and find loopholes. I've been trying to follow this the case in Arizona where they've challenged that and said, This is gambling, it's not trading, you try to call it trading, but it's it's gambling and you need a a license to operate gambling in in Arizona and you didn't do that and so they're filing a a
prosecution against Calci, I think it is in Arizona. and I hope those turn out. I hope that the government is able to hold these companies accountable for just trying to call gambling by a different name and enslave the world's population in in poverty.
shawn (02:28.354)
Yeah.
Matt (02:30.05)
Yeah, I I heard a story on the news where Victor Wimbanyama, the NBA player, has said he's not going to take any endorsement deals from gambling platforms. And he said he was upset that other NBA players do, right? Because LeBron James just signed a $15 million deal with one of them. So that makes me like like Victor Wimbanyama a bit more to be like, hey, here's a person taking a stand, supporting a moral issue in society, and maybe we should be more like that. What do you say, Sean?
shawn (02:50.37)
Yeah.
shawn (02:57.326)
I think that's the answer is is instead of getting government involved to regulate and to litigate, let like let's get righteous voices like Victor Wimbanyana going out. And it seems like once every five years our apostles get up and go, Hey, we need to do our our regular preaching to you against the against gambling. Yeah, let's let the leaders, the moral leaders of our society teach us, hey, it's an option it's an option for you, it's a choice there. Use your agency and choose correctly instead of getting locked into temptation.
Matt (03:26.318)
But you know that states make gambling illegal, right? Gambling is not legal in Utah. If you want to buy a lottery ticket, you have to leave Utah to buy a lottery ticket.
shawn (03:34.146)
Yeah, I personally think that's pretty stupid, right? The governments get involved with that. People can make their own choices.
Matt (03:39.948)
Okay.
Porter (03:40.052)
Well then what should be what should be illegal, Sean?
Matt (03:42.894)
Yeah, Sean, you don't you don't like abortion. You don't you don't
shawn (03:45.43)
Murder. Murder. Theft. Let's go let's start with the Ten Commandments, sh shall we?
Porter (03:49.992)
Well well wasn't was part of the point of Elder Christofferson's talk not that gambling is basically a form of theft.
Matt (03:58.947)
Yeah. He said you only profit by taking away from somebody else. So it's like th I guess not necessarily theft, but
shawn (03:59.855)
I don't think he said it explicitly, did he?
shawn (04:07.884)
Yeah. I I'm pretty I'm pretty sure Porter he didn't go as far as to say gambling is theft.
Porter (04:09.778)
You produce macroing.
Porter (04:14.974)
He didn't say gambling is theft, but he did say that in gambling, anything you gain is at the expense of someone else and you've produced nothing for it, which I would say is also a fair definition of theft. There's a lot of crossover. I also thought that definition probably applies to a lot of things that we would not necessarily call gambling, like lots of types of stock trading. Like if you short, which I would say maybe if you do that, this talk might have you look at.
shawn (04:35.904)
Yeah, exactly. Exac there you go. I like it, Porter.
Matt (04:37.516)
Mm-hmm.
Porter (04:44.294)
Look at that activity and see if it's worthwhile.
shawn (04:45.206)
What about s what about starting a business, border? What about entrepreneurialism? Maybe that should be illegal and immoral. That's risky. It's your same thing.
Porter (04:50.376)
Well that's what you're you're producing something. It's j the risk is not what makes it wrong because you're producing something. It's when you he said when you are trying to get something for nothing at the expense of someone else, and produce nothing. which if you're like shorting a company, yeah, that seems to meet those three criteria to me.
Matt (05:07.478)
And you produce nothing of value. Yeah.
Matt (05:15.661)
Yeah.
shawn (05:18.03)
Good point. Good point.
Matt (05:19.958)
I think porn, right? The OnlyFans content creators, that would fit that definition, right? You're trying to get something you're not producing anything of value. You're not helping society be better. So
Porter (05:29.712)
Yeah, well you're producing something that people will pay for, but it's harmful. It'd be like the the same would apply for like alcohol companies or tobacco companies. you're producing something and it has value because people will pay for it, but it's it's harmful to society. You don't
Matt (05:32.246)
But people will
Matt (05:39.192)
Mm-hmm.
shawn (05:46.072)
Porter, would you would you make would you make OnlyFans alcohol, tobacco illegal?
Matt (05:50.658)
Yes. Yes, I would.
Porter (05:51.629)
sure, yeah.
shawn (05:52.694)
I know Matt would. I Matt would. You would too, Porter?
Porter (05:55.976)
Yeah. At a at a state level, sure. Yeah.
shawn (05:58.741)
You political scientists, that's weird. Gosh.
Matt (06:00.238)
I know. We love we love federal
Porter (06:02.004)
I would vote I would vote for that. I would vote for that because these are things that are generally harmful to the whole society. and I would rather not not have them.
shawn (06:11.798)
So is so is so Mormonism is generally harmful to the whole society because it doesn't worship the right God. It doesn't worship the the traditional classic Trinitarian God. So I I I think that we should give the power to our political leaders to make that illegal too. How about that?
Matt (06:19.854)
Sean the
Matt (06:26.146)
This the
Porter (06:29.278)
Well no no no we're not giving the power to the political leaders. That's why we vote, Sean. That's why we vote. And that's why we have represent that's why we have representative government. Yeah.
shawn (06:33.492)
Well okay, so majority majority rules, I guarantee you it but it
Matt (06:34.488)
This is the beauty. It's the beauty of federalism, Sean. It's it's why federalism is inspired because over in the heathen land of California, you can look at Idaho that's like banned everything bad, and you can say, wow, it looks like Zion. It looks like the city of Enoch in that state. We want to be more like them. And in that way we can evangelize through our controlling government policies to places like California to say, join us and be more like us.
Porter (06:51.164)
Yeah.
shawn (06:59.222)
You y but you guys are s you guys are suggest you guys are suggesting that those laws should be passed not at a federal level but at a state level.
Porter (07:02.786)
there you go.
Matt (07:08.824)
Yeah.
Porter (07:08.862)
Well yeah, Congress doesn't really have authority to to pass those laws. That's not an enumerated power. But states can.
shawn (07:12.282)
I see. Well, th if if you would have started with that, I would have been way more open to it. you did. I missed that. Sorry, Porter. Sorry, man. Did you guys d K did you see that California is passing a law today that is making marriage under the age of eighteen illegal? Did you see that?
Matt (07:18.121)
Ha ha ha.
Porter (07:18.256)
I did, I did at the state level.
Matt (07:23.178)
If I if I can't get it at this Go ahead, Sean.
Porter (07:35.088)
I did not see that.
Matt (07:35.553)
Yeah, and we don't have that in Idaho. in Idaho you can get married as a minor. So we we feel like we don't like those kinds of restrictions, Sean. We want the freedom to marry whenever we want to marry. You know what else Cal California does? You have to get a blood test before you can get married so you can prove that you don't have AIDS or something like that. You don't have to do that in Idaho. We know in Idaho that you w nobody
shawn (07:44.558)
boy.
Porter (07:56.306)
Not true.
Everyone have to get a blood test before getting married in California? That sounds made up to me.
Matt (08:02.902)
No, it's true. You have to get a blood test in California. Yeah. And I think the the license is way expensive. Like aga again, if you
shawn (08:05.464)
Yeah.
shawn (08:09.624)
Did did we find out did we that's the border that can't be crossed border? We can illegal we can make what you drink illegal but you can't drink okay.
Matt (08:13.975)
Ha ha ha.
Porter (08:16.358)
I didn't say you can't do it. I said that sounds crazy.
Matt (08:21.87)
California believes that people get married under false pretenses. And in Idaho we just trust people. If you have an S T D or something, you would disclose that. You would never marry somebody and not tell them the whole truth about your life.
Porter (08:33.212)
You would never marry a sixteen year old and not tell them
Matt (08:36.718)
okay. Well, let's get to the big question or no, the the thought-provoking question this week, the one that we actually prepared for. Okay, so this week the US Senate passed the bipartisan Protect College Sports Act to limit student athlete pay, restrict transfers, and shield sports leaders from antitrust laws to curb rising spending in college athletics. The NCAA supports this bill.
The bill also protects funding for Olympic sports that are not, you know, as profitable as football and maybe basketball. But critics like the NAACP argue that it limits players' earnings and collective bargaining rights while protecting high executive profits. The bill is not let yet law. It still has to be approved by the House, and President Trump would have to sign it before January of 2027. So here's the question: Should the federal government regulate college sports?
shawn (09:35.778)
You wanna go porter or you want me to go?
Porter (09:38.076)
Should they I think this was a waste of time. Can they sure this is interstate commerce in a pretty pure sense. and Congress Congress is allowed to regulate that.
shawn (09:47.358)
interesting.
shawn (09:51.439)
good answer, Porter. that's interesting. Okay. No, but it's true. What he said is true, right? That was good.
Matt (09:53.272)
That's a terrible answer. That's I mean it's
Porter (09:55.058)
It's a
Matt (09:58.041)
Just because they can doesn't mean they should. Like, obviously. okay. It's more than a waste of it. It's it's like college football has never been better than it is now. And the only people that are mad are the people that were winning under the old system by paying players under the table. Like the idea that that Congress would come in and tell a student athlete.
Porter (10:00.434)
I said I don't think they should. I think it's it's a waste of time.
shawn (10:00.546)
That's what he said. That's what he said.
shawn (10:10.136)
Huh.
Matt (10:23.212)
You can only make this much money off of your name, image, and likeness. You can only make this much money playing a sport. Like that's crazy to me. Like the it doesn't feel conservative to me. it doesn't feel appropriate to me for the government to tell student athletes how much they can earn, where they can go to school, and to deny them of their rights to unionize and collectively bargain. Like nothing about that feels okay.
shawn (10:46.358)
That a boy, Matt. That a boy, Matt. I do agree with you. Yeah. I mean, let's let's be honest, really honest, right? Universities, colleges have become basically institutions for research, real estate, and athletics. That's what they are, right? In the in the age where we have just crazy credential inflation, right? You're you're you're this kids that I talk to, even at BYU, who are I like talk to so many. I'm like, well, what's your major? And
Matt (10:49.974)
You agree with me, Sean?
Porter (10:50.526)
Yeah.
Matt (11:03.395)
Mm-hmm.
shawn (11:16.162)
What's your degree and what what is that where does that land you after? And they're like, I I don't I don't know. Like I don't know what this degree lands me afterwards. Like there's this huge anyway, so I I I think you're right, man. It's become a very college has become a very, I guess, capitalistic institution. Research, real estate, and sports. That's all it is. And it's for profit.
Matt (11:36.067)
Well, and like if you look state by state at who is the highest paid public employee in each state, it's gonna be a football coach or a basketball coach. Those coaches at colleges are making salaries. I mean, ostensibly it's paid for by the public funds, right? By taxpayers. But in real reality, like donors donate money to an institution and then they pay those salaries. But the idea that people make that kind of money working a as a public employee.
shawn (11:46.243)
Yeah.
Matt (12:05.004)
It just seems crazy to me. But again, it's not something that Congress should be regul like who benefits? Who who benefits from legislation telling student athletes what they can and can't do in college sports? It would only be what, donors or universities, or probably the leagues, right? The SEC and the Big Ten or something like that. Or
Porter (12:25.584)
It seems like the N C double A
Matt (12:28.512)
Yeah. Right. Because nobody listens to the N C double A right now, right? So you create you give them power again to regulate things that there's like real laws behind it or something like that.
shawn (12:34.04)
Yeah. There you go. There you go.
Matt (12:39.648)
Okay. Well we all agree. That was easy. Listener, if you disagree with us, let us know. And then we will come after you when you tell us. No, no, this is really a good idea. We like when like billionaires get behind closed doors with senators to agree on legislation about telling kids what they can do.
shawn (12:42.328)
Yeah.
shawn (12:46.755)
Ha ha.
Porter (12:56.018)
Yeah. Well, see, I've heard a lot of senators, a lot of Republican senators have been mad that this is coming to the floor right now when they are getting very scared about this midterm, and they're all like desperately trying to keep their seats. And instead of voting on anything that anyone would care about, everyone's worried about cost of living, they're voting on this stupid sports thing when
They they've passed like less than a hundred bills this whole term and they're they're pulling up this nonsense thing because of some promise that John Thune made to I think this is Ted Cruz's bill, right?
Matt (13:27.606)
Yeah. Yeah.
Matt (13:37.184)
Yeah, Ted Cruz. Yep. Who's from Texas, right? And again, where's most of the money in college sports going? It's going into Texas. But yeah, that's interesting, right? We could be talking about the war with Iran. Maybe Congress should maybe get involved in like helping with that. Or maybe
shawn (13:38.326)
wow.
Porter (13:53.118)
Yeah, they had that I think Susan Collins was mad 'cause she had like a insulin affordability bill that she wanted a vote on, no vote on that. And she she's like at risk of losing her seat. She couldn't get that on the floor, but they got college sports on the floor.
Matt (13:59.811)
There you go. That would be nice.
Matt (14:05.987)
Yeah.
Matt (14:11.35)
And then they brought Jack Smith before the Senate for some reason. It's like, what's wrong with these senators? Like, yeah, what well, whatever. Let them lose, supporter. That's what I say. Let them lose. I know that you like Jim Rish, but and he I know he's gonna win in Idaho, but I still say, wouldn't it be awesome if Jim Rish lost his seat? Like, what would that say to Republican senators across the nation? Like, listen to voters sometimes. But okay, here's the next topic.
Porter (14:15.644)
Right, yeah, yeah.
Porter (14:22.654)
Yeah.
Matt (14:39.818)
In an opinion piece for the Salt Lake Tribune, sports writer Gordon Monson defended Brigham Young University cross-country runners after social media users criticized them for wearing standard athletic gear during warm weather practice. The controversy began when photos of female athletes in sports bras and running shorts, along with shirtless male runners, drew complaints from some members of the church who argued the clothing violated church standards of modesty.
So here's the question Does the church have a modesty standard that applies to athletic gear?
shawn (15:17.056)
obviously not. I mean no. And they
Matt (15:19.416)
There's are you come on, John. There's there's you when you go running no you don't run. When you go to the gym, you can wear whatever you want to wear to the gym. There's no modesty standard.
shawn (15:21.987)
What?
shawn (15:31.726)
Ha ha you're saying that there should be policing on what kind of uniform a volleyball player wears at BYU? Is that what you're saying?
Matt (15:42.519)
I'm not no, I'm saying athletic gear. I'm not saying I don't care about the BYU athletes' uniforms. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying, like, like when I'm in my house eating my breakfast and I see people jogging in front of my house or walking in front of my house, you're saying that there's no standard by which I can judge their modesty as they walk past or jog past my house.
Porter (16:02.632)
Yeah.
shawn (16:02.99)
Yeah, that's it's not your job, judge it's not your job to judge someone's modesty. So yeah, I'm I'm gonna stick with my my statement of saying no, there's no standard that you as a person has to judge anyone else about their modesty. Absolutely not. No. Is that the question? D do we have a s we have a standard that allows us to judge each other? No, we don't.
Matt (16:19.734)
Yeah, that's the question.
Porter (16:20.948)
Point for it.
Points to Sean, I dove into this topic cause I figured w whenever you are determining whether another person's clothing is in line with or contrary to God's principle based teachings about modesty, you're entering into Pharisaical territory. This is the and I figured if you're gonna enter into Pharisaical territory, you might as well
shawn (16:46.582)
Yeah Porter Good job Porter.
Matt (16:47.468)
What? Come on.
Porter (16:55.11)
Enter into it. I did I I went through like all the mentions I could find about modesty from nineteen ninety until today. I didn't go further back. and did like a legal analysis. What what's the word I found some very interesting stuff. This womb talk some of them seem to be a little bit
shawn (16:56.771)
Ha ha.
Matt (17:04.344)
That's good.
Matt (17:12.298)
Okay, good.
Porter (17:21.412)
self-contradictory back in the day because the principle we teach today of like modesty is about you know your your own humility and how you present yourself to others and to God they were teaching that back then and saying you know this is principle based but then would also give very specific guidelines for women not for men they would say for men
Matt (17:47.405)
Mm-hmm.
Porter (17:50.536)
They they would give all these specific guidelines for women, like young women should refrain from wearing off-the-shoulder, low-cut, revealing clothes. Young men should similarly maintain modesty in their dress. there was never like specific rules for men. it was principles for everybody, rules for women. but we've maintained the principles and we have now decisively
shawn (17:57.315)
Yeah, yeah.
shawn (18:02.924)
Yeah.
Porter (18:18.322)
Drop the rules. You will not find anything like that anywhere in any, you know, contemporary church teaching. What it says now in the 2026 for the strength of youth is as you make decisions about your clothing, hairstyle, and appearance, ask yourself, Am I honoring my body as a sacred gift from God? The Lord's standard, and then when it asks about dress, grooming, tattoos, and piercings.
The Lord's standard is for you to honor the sacredness of your body, even when this means being different from other people. Let this truth and the spirit be your guide as you make decisions, especially decisions that have lasting effects on your body. Be wise and faithful. Seek counsel from your family and leaders. And that's the that's the standard.
shawn (19:02.23)
Matt, you need to start an You need to st set it create a new YouTube channel for yourself called MormonPuritans dot com.
Matt (19:10.83)
Sean, I lived with you, and you would regularly get mad at me if I would just walk around in my underwear and nothing else. You'd be like, you'd be like, you're naked. Put some clothes on. maybe it was. I would say that to you. I'd be like, Sean, this is no lie, everybody. Back in the MTC when they had the shower that was just the tree shower, I hated taking a shower with Sean because he'd sit there brushing his teeth all naked with a big smile on his face, and I'm like,
shawn (19:17.486)
I did not I did not
Matt (19:41.002)
I don't that's what I'd be like, put some clothes on, Sean, you're having too much fun in the
shawn (19:44.335)
I think I think you very, very much repres misrepresented me in that situation. That was not what was happening. Jeez. I did brush my teeth, but I wasn't sitting there smiling and all happy.
Matt (19:52.822)
I could be wrong about that. Some of that might have been hyperbole.
Porter (20:00.5)
Yeah.
Matt (20:01.282)
Well, yeah, I don't I don't remember. I just remember after a couple of times I was like, I'm showering at nighttime when nobody's around because this makes me feel uncomfortable. But we don't do that. I haven't been in the MTC in a while, but I don't think they do the tree showers in the MTC anymore. I think there's a lot of things that churches move towards more modesty, more privacy, in terms of that sort of thing. And so it seems weird to me that on the one hand they're gonna say, you need to like pray about what clothes you should wear, let God tell you what clothes you should wear.
And on the other hand, be like, you know, less nudity in like gyms and things like that, right? It just seems like a weird sort of thing because how do you know? Like if you like, how do you know how is God gonna tell you like what you should wear when you have no standard from which to measure what you should wear? There has to be a standard.
Porter (20:48.839)
Well this is well, this is what I determined in my study was the reason why this was such a big deal for like mid-century members of the church. This is from a 2008 talk from Robert D. Hales, Modesty, Reverence for the Lord. He said, We are now two to three generations into wearing casual apparel. I was like, casual apparel. I realized.
shawn (21:16.132)
huh.
Porter (21:16.985)
Like a h when Robert D. Hales was growing up, the standards of public dress and grooming were extremely uniform across the global north. Like if you are gonna go out in public, there's a very specific thing that you should be wearing. Like if you're a grown man, you wear a suit and a hat when you go out in public. And as it was sort of at the same time as just standards of morality started to
Disintegrate and become more diffuse, that standards of dress also became more diffuse. And the standards of dress were fairly arbitrary, but the standards of morality were not. And I think the these things happening at the same time caused people to get very to to connect or even conflate the two. And that your your appearance for a long time.
being more conforming to very you know conservative way of dressing would be a reflection of your your moral standards. I think now that we're three or four generations away from everybody wearing the same thing, that there's not really a standard of what is the proper thing to wear, and it has become much more subjective, that it's not so much a reflection of your your internal standards of behavior and that
Yeah, you do have to just look at yourself. What does what you're wearing mean to you? What will it mean in the community or the situation that you're in? and evaluate it that way on a case by case basis. There's not a you know, across the board set of things that you're supposed to wear or not wear.
Matt (22:59.798)
Yeah, for me, it's always been a difficult topic because the scriptures say, man looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart. And so even the current guidelines that say something like, your outward appearance should reflect something inside of you, even that doesn't seem to be consistent with scripture to me. So I've never understood the connection between what I wear and who I who I am on the inside as a moral matter, as a or as a matter of like,
conscience or the the the the Lord guiding me or something like that. So this topic has always been very confusing to me because number one, it's not consistent for men and women. And then number two, it's like I don't understand how that fits with scripture at all.
shawn (23:35.543)
huh.
Porter (23:43.571)
Well, think now the way you dress is really seen as a form of communication. you know, it's a message that you're putting out into the world about your identity. I think even more so than than before. and so just as you should speak in a way or act in a way that reflects your discipleship, you should dress in a way that reflects your discipleship.
shawn (24:10.606)
Yeah and I
Porter (24:10.691)
And that's gonna look different in different situations, just like you speak different languages around the world or behave differently in different environments.
shawn (24:18.894)
Yeah, and I think the Matt the I think the latter day scriptural lens gives us a lot of insight in this, right? The scriptures talk so much about the purpose one of the main purposes of we're here on this earth is when Adam and Eve were faced with, should I take that fruit? Because it gives me knowledge, just like the gods, between good and evil, right and wrong. And God is nudging and saying, Yeah, you guys need the experiences on this planet to be pulled one way or the other.
And I like that throughout scripture and throughout the prophets, we've been given principles to guide us, but not compelling, like really specific, specific things to do. So for example, Matt, like can't you play this apply the same kind of I'm not gonna call them loose standards, but principle based, but not pharaoh Pharisee based, like like do this, don't do this, or law of Moses, do this. For example, the word of wisdom. Why is it that there's a swig on every corner in Utah and Idaho?
Why is it that these caffeinated drinks are not explicitly prohibited? And it's because like, isn't that a a good standard? Doesn't that make sense? But no, it doesn't, right? The Lord is saying you guys need to decide for yourselves, right? If you become addicted to caffeine and it becomes your energy source, you need to learn from that and decide, is that good for you? Or take language standards, Matt. Like I have plenty of friends who are the most faithful, obedient, repentant people I know. And they they sneak a few swear words in every now and then.
Matt (25:24.034)
Mm-hmm.
shawn (25:42.54)
Is that a ma is that terrible? Is that like my like why why right? Why isn't there a list of swear words that you can and can't say? Utah says friggin' all over the place. There's not. There's not. You don't have there's not a church list. Yeah, I know, but that'd be from you. That'd be from you.
Matt (25:43.566)
Yes.
Matt (25:50.85)
There is. I have a list. I'll give I'll create the list. I've got the list, Sean.
Porter (25:57.917)
You need to send it to Elder Christopherson so he can say them all at the next conference so we all know what not to say.
Matt (26:01.822)
Yeah.
shawn (26:05.336)
There you go.
Matt (26:06.956)
Okay, well, what about this? my wife tells me this all the time, but I don't know, fifteen, twenty years ago when I was in Kansas and I was in a bishopric and we had young women, we would tell them, You have an obligation to not put lustful thoughts into boys' minds and you need to dress in a manner not just reflective of what you think, but in a way to like protect the young men.
Porter (26:15.165)
Okay.
shawn (26:20.52)
Matt.
shawn (26:27.618)
Have you repented of that?
Matt (26:30.048)
I was told to set like that was in the handbook or something. I don't know.
Porter (26:32.817)
Yeah, let me let me tell you this is one from a
from it's from the nineties, I think.
shawn (26:45.314)
Yeah, I mean, as you look it up, Porter, you're not ever you're not ever gonna find compelling like in scripture, leaders compelled to force people with those types of things. Yeah, I'm okay, maybe for a little time there was some handbook instruction on that, but handbook changes, right? And it's okay to question some handbook things, right? That's not canonized church doctrine. And I'm not saying you did anything wrong, Matt. I'm saying, yeah, you should be an obedient bishop. But
Porter (26:47.325)
Yeah.
Matt (27:06.914)
You're saying that's a you're saying that's a wrong way to be today.
shawn (27:11.5)
Yeah, I think s I think so. Yeah, you can't communicate to someone, hey Matt, when you have that low neck pink T shirt right now, you're you're making me feel you make me feel a certain way. That's horrible. Okay, then just don't look at you.
Matt (27:18.945)
Yeah.
Porter (27:26.833)
Found it. This was in the For the Strength of Youth pamphlet in 1990. If you wear an immodest bathing suit, because it is the style, it sends a message that you are using your body to get attention and approval and that modesty is not important. this was this was wild to my 2026 sensibilities to read that this was in the for the strength of youth. But there but then also in 1990.
Matt (27:42.602)
Mm-hmm. Yeah.
Porter (27:56.729)
A a talk called Fight Obscenity that was mostly about pornography, but talked about modesty. He said, Modesty is defined by the temple garment. Even when participating in swimming and athletic activities, our dress and grooming should be modest. what are you talking about? so it seemed to be fairly inconsistent. Yeah.
shawn (28:08.184)
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah.
Matt (28:16.162)
We went I went water skiing with my grandma. I went water skiing with my grandma and she would not get into a swimsuit because she didn't want to take off her garment. So she's like pants and like long shirt jumped into the water because she wanted to follow the council.
shawn (28:29.362)
And and okay, and she I think the Lord will look at your grandma and go, my my blessed daughter, doing your best to be faithful and obedient, right? There's nothing wrong with what she did. She was trying to be faithful and obedient. But I think Porter, that first statement it was kind of setting a standard for what your intentions are, right? It wasn't necessarily judging, well, if you show this much skin, then you're in trouble. It was saying if your intention in wearing an immodest, you know, a bikini or whatever is to flaunt your body.
Porter (28:38.684)
Yeah.
shawn (28:59.17)
Then that does go against the principles taught of you know, modesty and chastity.
Porter (29:01.361)
Well, it and if it had said that, and that seems to be more the basis of today, like why are you wearing what you're wearing? Ask yourself this question, and if you can answer it and feel good, then you then you know what's right for you. But what it says in nineteen ninety is if you wear an immodest bathing suit because it's the style, it sends a message that you're using your body to get attention and approval.
shawn (29:14.38)
Do it, yeah.
Porter (29:29.265)
And then modesty is not supporting. So it's saying no matter what you think about it, if you wear a bathing suit that does not meet A B or C standard, other people are gonna think you're a slut, basically, is what it's saying.
Matt (29:33.335)
Mm.
shawn (29:37.699)
No, I think it did No, it did it put I look, it was the semantics are bad, right? It was poorly written and poorly phrased, but it is trying to say if your motive is to fit in with the world, or your motive is in let's face it today, the world's it the world teaches abundantly. Yeah, women, your only value is how you look, and so the more skin you show, the more valuable you are. And so I think it's trying to say that. Look, if the world values it
Porter (29:45.479)
Yeah.
shawn (30:06.818)
Basically, sexuality, and that's how you're wrapping your identity and the choices you make in your clothing. Yeah, you need to maybe talk with God or figure that out. But
Matt (30:15.32)
So, so when I was in graduate school, there were a lot of women that I in my classes. And I remember one time this distinguished person came to campus. And, you know, people want to get to know a distinguished scholar. They can help you with your career and things like that. And I remember going to this event where some of these women were dressed in ways I had never seen them dress before. They were showing a lot of cleavage, showing a lot of skin. And I remember asking one of them, I was like, Why are you dressed like that? And she's like, Are you kidding? Like, this is my chance to make an impression on him. And
shawn (30:41.292)
Uh-huh.
Matt (30:44.854)
If I've got it, I'm gonna use it everything I can to my advantage. And so what you're saying is that's wrong, right? To do that for that purpose is wrong. If she's just wearing the shirt because she feels comfortable in that shirt, no problem. But if you're intentionally trying to use your sexuality or something to get ahead.
shawn (31:01.056)
No I I don't know. I don't I don't think it's our place to judge at all what her intentions were. Like what what's the difference what's the difference between her making a decision to show a little bit of chest versus putting on lipstick? Right? The lipstick also the intention was to be a little more attractive in the world in order to get a leg up. Is that immoral? I don't think it's our place to judge that lady or anyone like what you're wearing.
Porter (31:06.587)
That's the thing.
Matt (31:13.835)
I see.
Matt (31:23.862)
I see.
Porter (31:25.105)
Yeah. And I this is this is one of the best principles I took out of my study. This is from The Friend in twenty seventeen. Be sure to be kind instead of judging others for the way they dress.
shawn (31:33.08)
Yeah.
Matt (31:38.287)
Stop. I don't like that. That's the friend. It's only to children. Children should be kind. Hey, Porter gets the points because he did a lot of research. That was super helpful, Porter. If you had if you hadn't brought that research, it'd have just been Sean and I talking about lipstick and people I knew in grad school. All right, here's the next topic. The US reached a major oil deal with Venezuela's unelected interim leader.
shawn (31:39.298)
Ha.
shawn (31:44.768)
Yeah,
Porter (31:44.979)
shawn (31:51.266)
Yeah, you get the points, Porter. That was cool. That's cool.
shawn (31:58.457)
Ha ha ha.
Matt (32:08.098)
Delcy Rodriguez following the capture of former President Nicolas Maduro by American Special Forces. Under the arrangement, the U.S. government takes a 35% stake in the parent company of a private producer called North American Blue Energy Partners, which grants America purchase rights and board oversight across major Venezuelan oil fields. President Donald Trump praised the agreement as a historic victory that will lower fuel costs and revive the Venezuelan economy.
However, energy experts point out that rebuilding the coun country's damaged, poorly maintained oil infrastructure will require massive private investment and many years to produce meaningful results. In addition, critics and Venezuelan citizens argue that the business arrangement legitimizes an unelected regime and risks delaying the return of a fair, democratic government. There was a time when the US military was used to promote democracy around the world. Now it seems
To be used more for a corporate interest? So here's the question Is our use of military force in Venezuela morally right or morally wrong?
shawn (33:16.034)
Matt, you know what is just in the question you asked, the most telling thing for me that teaches me that this Donald Trump Republican Party is no longer a recognizable Republican Party. It's when you say things like Donald Trump's Republican Party has 35% stake in a private company in Venezuela. Like that that is just that that's so anti conservative. That's exactly, exactly, exactly.
Matt (33:34.52)
In Venezuela.
Matt (33:40.142)
Karl Marx loves it. Karl Marx loves that idea.
Porter (33:43.891)
I don't think Karl Marx would love that idea. I think Xi Jinping would love that idea.
Matt (33:45.998)
Okay, we'll use Xi Ji Ping. Yeah. Putin loves that idea.
shawn (33:51.086)
Yeah.
Yeah, exactly. Disgusting. This is horrible.
Porter (33:54.001)
Yeah, this is state capitalism using the government as a a weapon to get more money into your own pocket. I th I would go a step further and say the use of violent military force anywhere for any purpose other than preventing the immediate loss of life is plainly wrong. Even if it's to just promote democracy, that's wrong. To just go kill people to make the government the way that you want it to be.
Matt (34:14.125)
What?
shawn (34:15.19)
Wow.
Porter (34:23.833)
Unless you are trying to stop people from dying immediately, you should not be using the military. And the military is not a good tool.
Matt (34:33.08)
So, like I'm thinking back to the Superman movie, right? There's that there's like a war that's going on and Superman isn't able to stop them because he's in some multiverse or something like that. And so there's like these people that are about to die in a war and a military comes in, or maybe some superheroes come in and they save those people from an attacking force. So you're saying we can use our military might in moments like that, that there's some atrocity that's about to happen, we can send in troops to stop that immediate thing.
But anything else is immoral.
Porter (35:05.127)
Yeah. If you if you know of if you know of p of people that are about to to commit an attack, if p if human life is at immediate risk, that's an appropriate way to use the military to stop that from happening. Or if something's ongoing to to mitigate and to stop further loss of life. Otherwise, you're abusing the military and it's a it's a real it's a real
shawn (35:06.904)
Matt, I hate your anal I hate your analogy you just brought in.
shawn (35:28.547)
and it's a it's a
Porter (35:35.207)
Credit to our founding fathers who thought we should not have a standing military at all because they knew it would be used for nonsense like this.
shawn (35:41.327)
Well okay, well hold on Porter. But but l as long as Matt's bringing in cheesy, stupid movies to not haven't you seen the movie the haven't you seen the minority report? The movie The Minority Report where the you you could you could predict within a certain timeline, you could predict people's cr crimes that would happen with like a thirty minute window and then you could go in and prevent the crime. Well what about that kind of mindset? No, really, like what kind of that mindset? If you know Matt or
Matt (35:47.23)
Hey, Superman what Yes, yes.
Porter (35:52.669)
Have you?
Matt (36:02.893)
Yes.
Porter (36:05.043)
Well
Matt (36:05.889)
Yeah.
shawn (36:08.75)
Porter, you weren't alive when 9 11 happened. Were you alive? You weren't alive. You wouldn't understand. Okay, you were a kid. You were just a kid. You were just a child.
Matt (36:10.978)
Yeah, you weren't alive. You wouldn't understand.
Porter (36:12.531)
I was alive, I was a kid.
Matt (36:16.322)
You couldn't possibly you couldn't possibly know a porter.
Porter (36:19.503)
shawn (36:20.236)
So b so George George Bush going in kind of preemptively and attacking everybody to prevent a future nine eleven. Why isn't that justified?
Matt (36:31.052)
Yeah. 'cause it worked after all. It worked. There there hasn't been another nine eleven since nine eleven.
Porter (36:31.857)
No, it's wrong. yeah, it's wrong because it's not immediate. You can't just kill people for something you think maybe might happen someday. but I the the back to the situation in Venezuela. This is ridiculous. And I keep seeing this thing online among Venezuelans. They say,
shawn (36:37.804)
Ha ha.
Porter (36:57.895)
They they captured Maduro, but the entire Maduro regime is still one hundred percent in place and intact, but now they have a gun to Maduro's head. Like they did not.
shawn (37:04.883)
what's that mean?
shawn (37:13.878)
Wow.
Porter (37:28.477)
Give anything back to the Venezuelan people. And I think Trump's claim that this is supposed to revitalize Venezuela or whatever is the most disingenuous, filthy thing he could possibly claim. Because this is 100% to put money in his own pocket and try to try to dampen the fact that he has driven gas prices through the roof, which we're not even going to see any benefits to gas prices for years and years and years because.
Venezuela's oil industry is not in a productive place at all right now. It's filthy, it's disgusting. And it's
shawn (38:03.746)
Yeah, Matt, these are the kinds of these are the kinds of moves that make a Republican like myself go, Yeah, I don't think we're Republicans anymore. So I'm not interested in your party. You've you've changed the party. I d I don't care to have an R next to my affiliation whatsoever because this isn't what I signed up for. This wasn't what it was. This is gross.
Matt (38:21.87)
But I think I'm I'm actually more on Porter's side about never use war too. Because so because the the US forces recently pulled out of Iraq. We no longer have any US forces in Iraq, which got me thinking about okay, 2004 is when we went into Iraq. Maybe it's 2003. We've been there a long time. And what did at what cost did what cost did the Iraqis pay for the freedoms that they now enjoy?
And it's 20 years of difficulty, right? For a lot of them, 20 years of like poverty. P journalists have been writing stories about what life life was like in Iraq when they first got there. And it got me to thinking about people that I know personally from Ukraine, the cost that that war in Ukraine has like the cost it's had on the people of Ukraine. War is tremendously painful, disruptive, and terrible. And I don't know that I was asking myself this question, like.
It how bad does the US government have to be before I would want a war in my community in order to change it? And I think I would put up with a lot of loss of liberty before I would want war in my neighborhood.
shawn (39:33.007)
But hang on, you but your stand Porter, I think the standard that you put out there that Matt's agreeing with, it's such a more nuanced and complicated decision. Like if we step if we lived by your standard, I think we would be the American government would be justified to engage in more wars now by your standard than otherwise. Think about it. How many how many people right now are at the risk of death or are dying? That we would then be justified to go in and engage in war? man.
Matt (39:49.374)
Because there's so many people at at risk.
Matt (39:59.383)
Mm.
Porter (40:00.989)
Well, I I guess I could put it in
shawn (40:01.07)
Are you kidd Iran Iran is Iran would be justified?
Matt (40:04.428)
Mm-hmm.
Porter (40:05.499)
Well no, because that was based on some hypothetical future risk possibly that they might obtain a nuclear weapon at some point, which is contrary to what our intelligence is telling us. It's not it's not they have a nuclear weapon and they're threatening to launch it.
Matt (40:15.17)
But there are pe there are people in Iran
shawn (40:16.45)
There are people.
shawn (40:20.376)
But there are people they're k
Matt (40:20.504)
But there are people in Iran being killed by their government.
Porter (40:23.099)
Yeah, yeah. And so I I I think you could, you know, addend onto it of if the military is going to actually be the most effective way to prevent that loss of life, because a lot of the time it's not. you know, it in this situation of you have a state actor that is oppressing, killing its own people, which is not like we don't do that, but
Matt (40:38.126)
Mm.
shawn (40:48.674)
Which which is a which is abund abund abundantly on a bigger scale. Yeah, abundantly.
Porter (40:51.269)
other, you know, other countries at a much bigger scale. Is the military really the most effective way to to institute regime change? I think our record has shown no, it is a horrible tool to try to change the way that governments behave towards their own people. It does not work. It always makes it worse.
shawn (41:09.538)
Yeah. Yeah, I'm just saying the new standard that you've set. No, I agree with you.
Porter (41:10.289)
And so that situation, some well saying, yeah, sure, but it addending on to that standard of it's never okay unless it's to prevent immediate loss of life. It's that doesn't mean it's always okay if it is to prevent loss of life, because the military might not be an effective tool to do that and you could end up causing more loss of life by i you know implementing violence.
shawn (41:27.607)
Yeah, okay.
shawn (41:39.086)
As long as you're willing to put those addendums in there, then I I think I I would lean towards you more. Yeah.
Matt (41:44.298)
Or or if it makes gas prices lower before the midterm elections. Just kidding. I'm gonna give points to Sean on that one because Sean, did you just announce that you've left the Republican Party?
shawn (41:46.48)
Ha ha ha
Porter (41:47.367)
That's okay.
shawn (41:57.807)
I don't think I've ever really been a like s repo I mean
Matt (42:01.486)
You c you can't leave something you were never a part of. Well anyhow, that's that's important, Sean. Like no, I do appreciate that Sean pointed out the way that the Republican Party has changed, that they're so different from what they were, what, twenty five years ago.
Porter (42:18.343)
Yeah. I really do hope that they get a big fat L this midterm and that that slap some sense into them and they decide to change and go back to the principles of I guess I was about to say go back to the principles of like fiscal conservativism, but I I don't know that they had that either.
shawn (42:26.093)
Yeah.
Matt (42:26.466)
Mm-hmm.
shawn (42:36.588)
Yeah, good point.
Matt (42:37.55)
Carl Rove, who who ran George W. Bush's presidential campaigns and was chief of staff in the White House when President Bush was president, he said this week he's voting for a Democrat for the second time in his life. So there's a big division in the Republican Party about what it means to be a Republican and what they should and should not stand for.
shawn (42:55.372)
Matt, I missed the days of Bill Clinton, George Bush, Ronald Reagan.
Porter (43:00.381)
Yes.
Matt (43:01.258)
Yeah. Then then things were good for white people.
shawn (43:05.778)
my co my gosh. Jeez.
Matt (43:09.752)
Just kidding. All right. Here's the big question. Northern Utah radio station KLO 103.1 FM has launched its All Christmas music programming beginning September 28th, breaking its own record for an early holiday start. Station program director Rob Ryson explained that they made the switch because of strong listener interest. Despite fall having just started, KLO, which currently holds a small
0.5% share of the regional listening market will play holiday hits through December before returning to its regular soft adult contemporary format. so here's the question: When is it okay to start playing Christmas music?
shawn (43:54.659)
Look, you you in Utah and Idaho have a right to have this discussion and to implement it early because look, you guys are the you guys are the states of seasons. Like in California, we don't are in San Diego, we don't have seasons. So you guys embrace and your seasons are beautiful. You have the right to start it early and earlier and earlier. You guys celebrate these seasons so well. I don't know about where you live, Porter, but in Utah, they can do it as early as they want because they do a good job at seasons. They do a good job.
Porter (44:12.679)
Yeah, yeah.
shawn (44:24.918)
At the holiday seasons.
Porter (44:25.671)
Yeah. No, you you got a good point. Like in Idaho, it's I I remember the day this season when I woke up and it was like, it's fall now. The air smells a little different. It just got a different feeling and it's like and it reminds me of Christmas. It's like okay, yeah. Now it's okay to listen to Christmas music.
shawn (44:35.206)
Nice. Yeah. Yeah.
shawn (44:41.814)
It's magic. It's magical, right? Yeah.
Matt (44:46.146)
Well, so is it gonna be a hundred degrees in San Diego today, Sean? You're really hot where you're at, right?
shawn (44:49.29)
It is. It's ninety s it's ninety seven 'cause of the El Nino, man. It's crazy.
Matt (44:53.206)
Yeah. Well s I know that it seems like this shouldn't be a moral question, but to me this is a moral question. I and I'm gonna explain why it's a moral question.
shawn (44:59.15)
Shut up, Matt. Okay. Don't no, don't even try this.
Matt (45:05.71)
Not I'm not gonna say that like soft adult contemporary is like like a a heathenistic form of music or something like that. But this is my problem with when you start Christmas early, in my opinion, it reduces it commercializes Christmas away from the true meaning of Christmas.
shawn (45:25.698)
Dude. The gr hang on pause, please. The greatest thing in my life y to to to this point in my life has just happened. You have literally become Charlie Brown. Dude, that is amazing what just happened. My greatest joy is that Matt Miles is now officially Charlie Brown. My two favorite characters on the planet.
Matt (45:39.102)
Yeah.
Porter (45:39.903)
Matt (45:43.618)
Thank you.
Matt (45:49.571)
Because when when I turn on Christmas music on the radio, I don't hear Christmas music anymore. I hear it's the Mariah Carey song, right? And it's the wham song. And it's there's some new like reggaetone kind of Christmas music. And none of it's about Jesus or the and so again, the the making Christmas start earlier is about it's like Santa Claus and trees and presents and reindeer and snowmen. And it's not about Jesus. And I know that people, especially my community,
Porter (45:50.674)
Yeah.
Matt (46:19.35)
Make it about Jesus, but the stuff that starts early isn't the Christ centered, focused things on Christmas. And so I think that it's better when Christmas season is shorter because it can be more Christ centered, or at least tends to be more Christ centered the closer you actually get to Christmas. And the stuff that starts earlier to me is not the true meaning of Christmas.
shawn (46:39.534)
Okay, Matt, great points. I'm gonna give you all the points. If right now you end that little sermon by saying, Isn't there anyone who knows what Christmas is all about? Re scream that out.
Matt (46:49.102)
Is that in a Charlie Brown movie?
Porter (46:49.54)
Yeah.
shawn (46:53.346)
Show them at Christmas, yeah, yeah.
Matt (46:55.122)
You're trying to y Charlie Brown Christmas isn't about Jesus?
shawn (46:59.042)
Yes, it is. This is this is the most perfect Christmas story about Jesus that has ever existed.
Porter (47:04.889)
Well, I I don't know. Christmas Christmas is a heathenistic holiday that's been retrofitted into a Christian holiday. It if you don't if you don't feel like you are, you know, trying to wrench some some Christianity out of the commercialism of the world, then it's not really Christmas. You gotta you gotta engage with that struggle every year. So I think Christmas music whenever you want.
shawn (47:16.078)
This is the porter response I expect.
shawn (47:28.94)
Ha
Matt (47:29.294)
Ha ha.
Matt (47:34.616)
So when I was at Costco the other day, they had a giant life size nativity set that you could buy for like a thousand dollars. I have no problem with selling the nativity sets earlier and earlier in the year. But Christmas music on the radio, that's where I draw the line. Like if you want to buy a life size camel and like wiseman and all that stuff and put those on your lawn, that's fine. But Christmas music on the radio is not Christmas music. It's just commercialized, ruined Christmas music. That's my take.
Porter (47:45.681)
But
shawn (48:03.49)
Ha ha ha. That's interesting take. That's awesome. That's amazing, Matt.
Matt (48:05.824)
All right. So then there is no appropriate time to play that kind of music. you have to wait yeah.
shawn (48:10.848)
No well, I mean, I'll let me give it being a music lover that I am, let me give a little bit of a re a rebuttal to that. So even the cheesy commercialized Christmas music's music at least is lending to a a culture that that pushes towards this Christmas idea. You know, it's a tool. They're they're tools, man. They bring a feeling of nostalgia and of joy that is associated in a little part today with Jesus Christ and his birth. Now
There's that's better that than nothing, right? So I think it is I'm gonna argue with it that you're wrong, and it's better to do it earlier because it's at least getting people thinking about, yeah, sure. Their first thoughts go to Mariah Carey and gifts and presents and how am I gonna bring Santa Claus in and it's fun and it's festive. But there is going to be maybe a little bit of a chance that they're also gonna go, well, why are we doing all this? the gifts represent the gift that Jesus gave us, and that's why we're representing it to each other. Maybe we will it's better than nothing, Matt.
Like you're Kenny you're Kenny G. You'd rather be listening to Kenny G because you're like Kenny G gives me that saxophone. That's yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Matt (49:11.437)
Yeah.
Come they told me param pa pum pam. Yeah, little drummer boy. Yeah, it's ho it's holy and good. Okay. Well Sean, you get the last word. That was awesome. Thanks, you guys. Listeners, thanks for joining us. Let us know what you think about modesty. Please tell me I'm right. Have a good week, everyone.